Playing
into right-wing hate
As
the dust settles, radical conservatives have found their
enemies
In times
like these, it's difficult to know what to do or
say. It is now more than 32 hours since four civilian
aircraft were hijacked; two crashed into New York's
World Trade Center, one into one side of the Pentagon,
and one went down in Pennsylvania. Hundreds of
people are known to be dead, and who knows how high the
death toll will become when the rubble is finally cleared
away. Watching the two New York towers crumble on
live television was horrifying and shocking. My heart
goes out to the families of all the people who died
and were injured in this devastating attack.
To tell
the truth, I'm in a kind of daze. The destruction
was so enormous that some reporter noted that
the Cosmonauts reported that they were able to see
the plumes of smoke emanating from the World Trade Center
from several hundred miles above the Earth.
The
television networks focused all their resources on the
calamity -- without commercial interruption. By night's
end the usual coterie of experts on terrorism --
many that we've seen before -- were being trucked out.
President Bush spoke to the nation several times. In
the nation's capital, Democrats and Republicans joined
hands, resolved to stand together as one America.
As of
early this morning, it seemed that it was too early
to think about the long-range implications these horrific
terrorist acts would have for future U.S. policy.
Would an increased military budget, greater attacks
on our Civil Liberties, more money for Intelligence
agencies, state-sanctioned assassinations and
indiscriminate U.S. military air attacks be coming down
the pike? These possibilities seemed too huge and distant
to really get a handle on.
Two
things shook me out of my daze this afternoon: an interview
I saw on CBS with Senator Richard Shelby (R-Ala.),
and the latest edition of The Federalist Society's
The Federalist Chronicle.
Senator
Shelby was, well, unhinged -- believe me when I
tell you that there's just no other way to describe it
-- as he basically called for an all-out war against
terrorists and the countries that harbor them. He
seemed to assert that there should be no stopping until
they were all removed from the face of the earth.
If this
was the raving of just one conservative Senator,
that could be seen as par for the course. But,
the fact is that when it comes to military and intelligence
issues, Senator Shelby is an extremely powerful
and influential voice on Capitol Hill. His rage
surely represents a large body of congressional opinion
that is undoubtedly building as I write this. And,
there's little doubt it will continue to grow in the
days to come.
I've
monitored the conservative movement in this country
for a long time. I'm not easily shocked or even
surprised by some of the things I read in the right-wing
press. However, the tone and language of today's
edition of The Federalist Chronicle set me back.
It was patently outrageous; it was so over the top.
And it too undoubtedly reflects the thinking of most
of those running the Bush administration.
The
Federalist Chronicle begins by laying the full burden
of blame for these terrorist attacks directly at
the doorstep of Bill Clinton:
"The
United States of America is at war This momentous event
caps the tragedy of years of appeasement of rogue
nations and terrorists, appeasement that reached a
zenith during the eight years of Bill Clinton's administration
The real legacy of Bill Clinton was sketched
in graphic images yesterday, across the skyline
of Manhattan, before the eyes of the entire world.
Clinton's DNC [Democratic National Committee] Chairman
Terry McAuliffe said, 'There are no partisans today,
only patriots.' But, to be sure, the partisans of
yesterday have patriot blood on their hands today."
The
Federalist Chronicle asks: "Where do we go from here?"
Their answer is startling in its brutality.
Despite
pressure from "leftists on Capitol Hill" the president
should make it clear that "Tuesday's events were,
indeed, an act of WAR." The Chronicle quotes former
House Speaker Newt Gingrich as saying, "I don't want
to bring them to justice. I want to defeat them."
"It
is The Federalist's position that we should give nation's
[sic] which harbor terrorists the same advance
warning we gave Hiroshima - and let fly. We must
to [sic] turn the sands of Afghanistan into molten
glass - NOW - and let [Osama] bin Laden's other host
nations know that our actions against Afghanistan are
only the first volley of fire."
Bottom
Line for the Federalists: "Support President Bush's
effort to rebuild our military and intelligence capabilities.
Support his efforts to establish a viable
missile defense system to protect our nation from
the high frontier of terror that will soon be available
for rogue states and their surrogate actors. And
we call once again for all Americans to maintain a level
of civil preparedness for such tragic events. Tuesday's
attacks were the opening rounds - not the closing
rounds of this war."
This
is not the time to recount the history of U.S. support
for Afghanistan's Taliban, or the CIA's connections
to bin Laden (see "Bin Laden comes home to roost:
His CIA ties are only the beginning of a woeful story").
It is, however, worth pointing out that as recently
as this past May the Bush administration awarded
$43 million to the Taliban. According to the Los
Angeles Times' Robert Scheer, this made the U.S. "the
main sponsor of the Taliban."
I am
grieving for the dead. I'm hoping that there will be
more rescues in the hours to come. It is rare that the
nation stops and everyone is focused on one thing and
that thing alone. Therefore, let this be a time of reflection,
not retribution. The people who planned and
participated in these terribly brutal and cruel acts
should be brought to justice. However, the conditions
that caused these acts will not be resolved by
escalating the cycle of violence. Entire countries and
peoples should not be laid to waste as a show of America's
unrelenting imperial power.
------------------------------------------------------
Bill
Berkowitz is a longtime observer of the conservative
movement. His WorkingForChange column Conservative
Watch documents the strategies, players, institutions,
victories and defeats of the American right.